So, Claude CoWork

Since my last series of AI process posts, the much hyped Claude CoWork finally came to Windows. I was curious about it, so I upgraded to a Claude Pro account. I am enjoying the increased chatbot usage that comes with a Pro account. Claude, possibly, is not. Periodically it starts gently hinting that we are DONE with a particular subtopic and need to MOVE ON. As for CoWork itself, the Windows version is very glitchy. I’ve only gotten a modest amount of useful work out of it. Specifically, I wanted to go back and make clearer POV shift indicators for some of my past novels. I put the manuscripts in a subfolder of the only folder on the computer that CoWork has access to. Then I asked CoWork to review each manuscript, and write a report which quotes the first sentence after each POV shift. Here’s a couple observations:

-Opus 4.6 glitches out less often than Sonnet 4.6 does in Cowork mode, but lives up to its reputation as a usage hog. Reviewing one 50K-ish word manuscript and writing the report on it used up most of a Pro Plan usage session. I ended up running these tasks at times when my session limits had reset, and I did not expect to need Claude for a while. Late at night, early in the morning, times like that.

-Even Opus 4.6 glitches out in CoWork when asked to write fanfic. This might be a guardrail related to Anthropic’s predominantly corporate focus for CoWork. Or maybe I’m not giving it clear enough instructions. As you can see from the past “Fanficcing with Claude” posts, I tend to be pretty general in my fanficcing instructions.

-My initial feeling is that CoWork is going to be most useful for tasks too large for a chatbot and too specific to justify building a whole automation, but we’ll see how it goes.

Due Disclosure: Me and AI and Marketing

To me, AI is a flawed but interesting tool, brought to us by the same flawed (and often corrupt) people who brought us the rest of the modern conveniences we live with. Other people have other opinions about it, and out of respect for them, I try to be transparent about my use of AI.

I do not use AI for first draft writing or for high-level concept and character background work. I have found ai chatbots (mostly Claude.ai) helpful for tasks like:

Continue reading “Due Disclosure: Me and AI and Marketing”

State of the Dictator, 2025

When I was talking to another writer on Discord, I realized that I tend to be somewhat vague and off-handed when I talk about my writing process, and assume people already know what I’m talking about, so I’m going to walk through the whole process here for transparency’s sake. This process includes the use of AI software for transcription and cleanup of dictated content, but it doesn’t start or end there, so if you are interested in that part, please, bear with me until I get there.

Continue reading “State of the Dictator, 2025”

Thoughts About LLMs, aka “AIs”

(Note: in this piece, I link to a lot of websites that I’ve played with at different times. This is to allow the reader to make up their own minds about these things. No endorsement is intended, except of course when I am linking to my own books. If I didn’t like them, I wouldn’t publish them.)

First off, what we see today is not truly artificial intelligence, in the sense of “artificial sapient beings capable of exercising judgment and choice.” ChatGPT, Stable Diffusion and their many cousins and descendants are Large Learning Models (LLMs), software that has been programmed to extrapolate statistical information from the dataset it is given and offer randomized responses to human commands based on the dataset and the extrapolations. The results are only as good as the initial programming, and the dataset. And in terms of output, they’re only vastly more complicated versions of the random generators available at Seventh Sanctum and similar websites for more than a decade. Here are the situations in which I personally have used LLMs:

Continue reading “Thoughts About LLMs, aka “AIs””